Some results of studying phytophagous insects feeding on Cuscuta spp. (Cuscutaceae) conducted by FGBU “VNIIKR” researchers
https://doi.org/10.69536/FKR.2021.40.89.001
Abstract
The article presents the results of studying the insects feeding on quarantine weeds of Cuscuta spp. (Cuscutaceae). The research was conducted by FGBU “VNIIKR” specialists in the Russian Federation and some neighboring countries from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. The list of the detected on Cuscuta spp. and identified phytophages includes 26 insect species of the orders Homoptera, Heteroptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera. The biology of some phytophagous species and some of their parasites of Hymenoptera order has been studied. Detailed data on the biology of the most significant phytophages, Smicronyx genus snout and bark beetles and Melanagromyza cuscutae, as well as their effect on Cuscutaceae have been given. Conclusions have been drawn about the insignificant regulatory effect of the identified phytophages on Cuscutaceae populations.
Keywords
About the Author
O. G. VolkovRussian Federation
Oleg Volkov - Head of Biomethod Department, FGBU VNIIKR.
Bykovo, Ramenskoye, Moscow Oblast
References
1. Baytenov M. Weevils of Central Asia and Kazakhstan [Zhuki-dolgonosiki Sredney Azii i Kazakhstana]. Alma- Ata, Nauka of Kazakh SSR, 1974; 287 pp. (in Russian).
2. Beilin I. Parasitism and epiphytothiology (on the example of parasites from higher plants) [Parazitizm i epifitotiologiya (na primere parazitov iz vysshikh rasteniy)]. M., Nauka, 1986; 352 pp. (in Russian).
3. Bulgakova L. Honey plants of nomadic beekeeping [Medonosy kochevogo pchelovodstva]. Tashkent, Mekhnat, 1989; 144 pp. (in Russian).
4. Butkov A. Family Cuscutaceae [Semeystvo Povilikovyye]. Flora of the USSR, v. XIX. M.-L., 1953: 43–76 (in Russian).
5. Volkov O. Prospects for biological regulation of Cuscutaceae [Perspektivy biologicheskoy regulyatsii povilik]. Plant protection, 1989; 11: 18–19 (in Russian).
6. Volkov O. Phytophages as Potential Agents of Biological Control of Dodders [Fitofagi kak veroyatnyye agenty biologicheskoy bor’by s povilikami]. Quarantine pests, diseases and weeds. Collection of scientific papers, part II. Bykovo, 1991: 177–184 (in Russian).
7. Gilyarov A.M. Ecology of the biosphere [Ekolo-giya biosfery]. M., Moscow University Publishing House, 2016: 160 pp. (in Russian).
8. Ivannikov A. Fly Melanagromyza cuscutae – enemy of dodder in Kazakhstan [Mushka Melanagromyza cuscutae – vrag poveliki v Kazakhstane]. Agricultural Science Bulletin, 1969; 1: 85–88 (in Russian).
9. Ivannikov A. Dodder fly [Povilikovaya mukha]. Plant protection, 1972; 7: 23–24 (in Russian).
10. Kiseleva K., Mayorov S., Novikov V. Flora of Central Russia: Atlas-Keys [Flora sredney polosy Rossii: Atlasopredelitel]. M., Phyton +, 2010; 544 pp. (in Russian).
11. Lazkov G., Sultanova B. Cadastre of flora of Kyrgyzstan: vascular plants [Kadastr flory Kyrgyzstana: sosudistyye rasteniya]. Norrlinia, 2011; 24: 1–166 (in Russian).
12. Lopatin I. Leaf beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) of Central Asia [Zhuki-listoyedy (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) Tsentralnoy Azii]. Minsk, BGU, 2010; 511 pp. (in Russian).
13. Marikovsky P., Ivannikov A. On the prospects of the biological method of combating dodders in Kazakhstan [O perspektivakh biologicheskogo metoda borby s povilikami v Kazakhstane]. Works of the Kazakh Institute of Plant Protection, vol. 10. Alma-Ata, 1968; 202–208 (in Russian).
14. Nikitin V. Weed plants of the flora of the USSR [Sornyye rasteniya flory SSSR]. L., Nauka, 1983; 454 pp. (in Russian).
15. Nikiticheva Z. Family Cuscutaceae [Semeistvo Cuscutaceae]. Plant Life. Vol. V, Part II. M., Prosveshenie, 1981; 389–390 (in Russian).
16. Slepyan E.I. Pathological neoplasms and their causative agents in plants: gallogenesis and parasitic teratogenesis [Patologicheskiye novoobrazovaniya i ikh vozbuditeli u rasteniy: gallogenez i parazitarnyy teratogenez]. L., Nauka, 1973; 512 pp. (in Russian).
17. Sukholozova E., Sukholozov E., Safonov A. Dodders of natural and anthropogenically modified coenoses in Penza region and their possible biological control agents [Poviliki yestestvennykh i antropogenno izmenennykh soobshchestv Penzenskoy oblasti]. PLANT Health and Quarantine, 2020; 3 (3): 52–64 (in Russian).
18. Tverdislov V., Sidorova A., Yakovenko L. Biophysical ecology [Biofizicheskaya ekologiya]. M., Krasand, 2012; 544 pp. (in Russian).
19. Faivush G., Tamanyan K. Invasive and expansive plant species in Armenia [Invazivnyye i ekspansivnyye vidy rasteniy Armenii]. Yerevan, Institute of Botany NAS RA, 2014; 272 pp. (in Russian).
20. Fedorov A. (executive editor), Kamelin R. ( volume editor). Flora of the European part of the USSR [Flora yevropeyskoy chasti SSSR], vol. V. L., Nauka, 1981; 380 pp. (in Russian).
21. Shinkarenko V. Enemy of the dodder [Vrag po-viliki]. Plant Protection, 1980; 11: 44 (in Russian).
22. Shinkarenko V. Phytophages of dodders [Fi-tofagi povilik]. Plant Protection, 1982; 2: 29–30 (in Russian).
23. Shinkarenko V. Weevils in the fight against dodders [Dolgonosiki v borbe s povilikami]. Plant Protection, 1982; 7: 30–31 (in Russian).
24. Koch M., Wir bestimmen Schmetterlinge. Leipzig-Radebeul: Neumann Verlag, 1984, 792 p.
25. Hodge P. J., 2012. Bruchidius imbricornis (Panzer, 1795) (Chrysomelidae) new to the British Isles. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308012323 (last accessed: 31.05.2021).
Review
For citations:
Volkov O.G. Some results of studying phytophagous insects feeding on Cuscuta spp. (Cuscutaceae) conducted by FGBU “VNIIKR” researchers. Plant Health and Quarantine. 2021;(3):58-71. https://doi.org/10.69536/FKR.2021.40.89.001